Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens by Nancy Worman

Posted by

By Nancy Worman

This examine of the language of insult charts abuse in classical Athenian literature that centres at the mouth and its appetites, in particular speaking, consuming, consuming, and sexual actions. Attic comedy, Platonic discussion, and fourth-century oratory usually set up insulting depictions of the mouth and its excesses as a way to deride expert audio system as sophists, demagogues, and ladies. even if the styles of images explored are very popular in old invective and later western literary traditions, this is often the 1st publication to debate this phenomenon in classical literature. It responds to a starting to be curiosity in either abusive speech genres and the illustration of the physique, illuminating an iambic discourse that isolates the intemperate mouth as a visual logo of behaviours ridiculed within the democratic arenas of classical Athens.

Show description

Read Online or Download Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens PDF

Similar ancient & medieval literature books

Isocrates, Volume I: To Demonicus, To Nicocles, Nicocles or The Cyprians, Panegyricus, To Philip, and Archidamus (Loeb Classical Library)

The significance of Isocrates for the research of Greek civilisation of the fourth century BCE is undeniable. From 403 to 393 he wrote speeches for Athenian legislation courts, after which grew to become a instructor of composition for would-be orators. After developing a faculty of rhetoric in Chios he lower back to Athens and proven there a loose institution of 'philosophia' concerning a realistic schooling of the entire brain, personality, judgment, and mastery of language.


This is often the 1st quantity of accrued papers to be dedicated to the paintings of Philostratus, the good essayist, biographer and historian of Greek tradition within the Roman international, and the main scintillating author of Greek prose within the 3rd century advert. The papers disguise his impressive diversity, from hagiographic fiction to historic discussion, from pictorial description to like letters, and from prescriptions for gymnastics to the lives of the Sophists.

Themistius : on Aristotle On the soul

Themistius ran his philosophical university in Constantinople in the midst of the fourth century A. D. His paraphrases of Aristotle's writings are in contrast to the flowery commentaries produced via Alexander of Aphrodisias, or the later Neoplatonists Simplicius and Philoponus. His goal used to be to supply a transparent and self sustaining restatement of Aristotle's textual content which might be obtainable as an user-friendly exegesis.

Additional info for Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens

Sample text

394–97; and see Sa¨ıd 1979b: 31, who points out that Antinoos’ refus du don effectively brings war into the feast, and thus perpetrates the intermingling of the two settings most opposed in the Homeric world. 217–32). Cf. 299–301). 500, 546–47); cf. Hendrickson 1925: 108. Nagy 1979: 228–31, who compares the Margites, a mock-epic that Aristotle attributes to Homer (Poet. 1448b28–38). See Allen 1912: 152–59 for the collected testimonia and fragments. , again, Melantheus (Od. 219–28); also Eurymachus (Od.

But cf. Bakhtin 1984: 426–27, who argues that the blason in medieval French usage originally denoted praise or blame: “a systematic dissection and anatomization of woman in a tone of humorous, familiar praise or denigration” (427). , Herrick’s “False in legs, false in thighes;/ False in breast, teeth, hair, and eyes” (“Upon Some Women,” 1648 [1963]: 109; and Rochester’s “Her hand, her foot, her very look’s a cunt” (“The Imperfect Enjoyment”), 1680 [1999]: 14, line 18). , mouth, throat, belly, anus).

Sexual innuendo is rarer and more oblique), and more brutal in others, since the piling on of abusive detail aimed at the ruin of one’s opponent. In their disputes over the embassy to Philip (Aesch. 2, Dem. 19) and over whether Demosthenes should be crowned as a public benefactor (Aesch. 3, Dem. 18), the character types that both speakers formulate for each other repeatedly associate the mouth with various types of intemperate behavior. The booming voice of Aeschines encourages his opponent to offer it as evidence of a voracious and low-class type.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.05 of 5 – based on 36 votes